The Long Road

For this week’s blog, I decided to write about the pattern called “The Long Road” from Chapter 3. My previous blogs touched a bit on the contents of this pattern so I decided to discuss what the authors suggest for this pattern. In this pattern, the situation that is presented relates to how your aspirations to become a master software developer conflict with the expectations of others and how “Conventional wisdom tells you to take the highest-paying job and the first promotion you can get your hands on, to stop programming and get onto more important work rather than slowly building up your skills”. 

The solution that is presented is to first accept the judgments you may receive from others to go against the status quo and then to stay focused on the long term. During the journey you will gain quite a bit of skills and knowledge; it is a long one so you need to prepare for it by drawing your own map. The text mentions “ you should keep in mind the expectation that you will be a working software developer even when you are middle-aged. Let this influence the jobs you take and the scope of your ambitions. If you’re still going to be working in 20 years’ time, then you can do anything”. You will be able to catch up to anyone in terms of skills in the decades that you will work and you may just pass them. Before reading this pattern I never really thought about just how long I will be working in the field. As I have discussed in many of my blogs for this class, I have been working on developing myself professionally and learning from other developers; as I have progressed, I have thought about the possibility of not being the weakest on the team so I agree that it is realistic to surpass people during your long journey.

The pattern really stresses the idea that instead of counting the days to retirement, a craftsman will willingly work until their final decades. You should thoughtfully work on developing your craft over many years. The idea of taking the long road is the foundation for a successful apprenticeship along with self-assessment. I couldn’t find anything in this section that I could disagree with. It definitely made me think of what I want to get out of this long journey because I didn’t take the time to think about it in-depth before.

Test-Driven Development

For this week’s blog, I decided to find a blog that discusses test-driven development (TDD). I found a blog called “Test Driven Development is the best thing that has happened to software design” by Arek Torczuk. In this blog, the author walks through how they apply key elements through real examples. Throughout the blog, they explain their reasons for implementing TDD and walk through how to use TDD on code that is impossible to test. They split their explanation of how to test impossible code into small sections that include bits of example code to aid in the explanation. I found the organization of the blog along with the various examples to be particularly helpful in aiding the reader understand the topic and stay engaged.

The author first explains that TDD is implemented in a fail, pass, refactor cycle approach. They shorten the idea by explaining that “our focus remains on the ‘what’, and our knowledge of ‘how’ is postponed.” In this section, the author also provides a visual which I find to be effective in blatantly pointing out the important details of this section. They then go on to explain the differences between when tests are driven by code and when code is driven by tests. When tests are driven by code although the tests written for the code may pass it may not be the right approach as feedback about implementation and design may be lacking. There are 2 questions that one has to ask themselves when they take this approach: “When should I stop adding new tests?” And “Am I sure the implementation is finished?”. The latter approach (when code is driven by tests) forces you to ask yourself “What do I expect from the code?”. When code is driven by tests, you know when to stop. TDD provides fast feedback.

The various examples of code that are impossible to test were interesting to read through. One example I found fascinating was the “Bloated setup” and the “Mocking Hell” scenarios. The first scenario is where an object either has too many dependencies or the Single Responsibility principle has been broken. The author explained that in this case you should you should rethink your design. The latter is where a mock returns a mock that returns a mock.

Overall, I think this was an interesting read. I think reading through the various examples of how to test impossible code will be useful for the future as I will have to think through how to test different kinds of code and when I should rethink certain designs.